[Greens-Media] MEDIA: Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 Ineffective and Out of Date

[Chapple, Robin]

Robin Chapple MLC
Member for the Mining and Pastoral Region


MEDIA RELEASE

Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 ineffective and out of date

Serious concerns have been raised by a recent intern report about "The Effectiveness of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972".

"Motivated by anecdotal evidence about issues with the functioning of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 I submitted this theme for detailed research in the annual parliamentary Intern program".

Ms Madisson Barnsby recently completed her report under supervision from Murdoch University. It made the following findings:


?  The responsible authorities do not seem to be consulting with the relevant people in order to provide Aboriginal sites with the appropriate protection.



?  The appeals process involved is not effective enough in order to maintain an efficient system within the Department.



?  Section 18 is the most contentious part of the Act, and the Department has time and again approved the majority of Section 18 applications that are sent to them, regardless of the recommendations made by the Aboriginal Cultural Materials Committee (ACMC).



?  The ACMC has a complicated job, which is complicated further by its lack of membership.



?  The Site Recording Forms used by the ACMC are no longer effective, as they can actually inhibit the registration of Aboriginal sites.



?  Problems within the Department have been shown to come down to Ministerial discretion, as well as the staff and their possible lack of relevant qualifications.



?  The DAA does not effectively monitor or enforce the Act, and that



?  The use of the 'Special Defence of Lack of Knowledge' can be reduced with increased accessibility to the Act's Due Diligence Guidelines.



To remedy the lack of process the report also suggests six recommendations:



1.    More resources need to be put into the Department of Aboriginal Affairs in order for it to improve its appeals, monitoring and enforcement processes.



2.    The Site Recording Forms need to again be amended so that they are simpler to use, and no longer inhibit the registering of Aboriginal sites.



3.    Decisions regarding Section 18 applications need to involve the Department, and not just the Minister. These decisions should also be made after detailed consultations with the relevant groups of people have been sought and carried out.



4.    The Aboriginal Cultural Materials Committee needs to increase its membership as recommended by Dawn Casey, especially to statutorily include at least one specialist anthropologist, as the Aboriginal Heritage Act dictates.



5.    Senior positions within the Department that deal with Aboriginal sites and their assessments should have the relevant qualifications in the fields of Archaeology and Anthropology.



6.    The Aboriginal Heritage Act's 'Due Diligence Guidelines[1]' should be more widely distributed and promoted.



"The findings of this report match the anecdotal evidence I and others have received in the past years. Aboriginal heritage is precious and needs to be better protected. The Department of Aboriginal Affairs must become more effective at monitoring, protecting and implementing the Act."



The report was tabled in Parliament yesterday, access it here:

http://www.robinchapple.com/effectiveness-aboriginal-heritage-act-1972-maddison-barsnsby


All the best

Robin Chapple MLC
Member for the Mining and Pastoral Region
PO Box 94, West Perth WA 6872
41 Havelock Street, West Perth. WA 6005

Phone: (08) 9486 8255 | Email: Robin.Chapple at mp.wa.gov.au<mailto:Robin.Chapple at mp.wa.gov.au>  | Freecall: 1800 138 610 | WEB: http://robinchapple.com/
Our office provides a facility for members of the public to ask their own Parliamentary Questions through my website at http://www.robinchapple.com/ask-question. Questions on Notice are preferred, instructions and templates are provided.
[Description: Description: Description: twitter logo]<https://twitter.com/#!/ChappleMLC>[Description: Description: Description: facebook logo]<https://www.facebook.com/#!/ChappleMLC>
? please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of the above mentioned organisations or person must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect.


________________________________

[1]Aboriginal Heritage Due Diligence Guidelines, 30 April 2013, Version 3.0 http://www.daa.wa.gov.au/Documents/HeritageCulture/Heritage%20management/AHA_Due_Diligence_Guidelines.pdf?epslanguage=en