[Greens-Media] Government and Port of Melbourne should stop secrecy and release all information about channel deepening - Pennicuik

[Amanda.Sharp at parliament.vic.gov.au]

Government and Port of Melbourne should stop secrecy and release all 
information about channel deepening

8 July 2013

Media reports yesterday that the government has received two 
'confidential' reports that link channel deepening to coastal erosion in 
the south of Port Phillip Bay and the loss of Portsea front beach are no 
surprise to locals or others who have been watching the changes in the 
south of the Bay since the channel deepening project ended, Sue Pennicuik, 
Greens MP for Southern Metropolitan Region said today.

"Why are these reports confidential?" Ms Pennicuik asked. "Information 
about the state of Port Phillip Bay belongs to the public, not to the 
Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) or to the Port of 
Melbourne," she said.

The Port has refused to release the full range of data it has collected on 
the changed bathymetry in the Bay since channel deepening.

"I have asked for this information through the parliament and through 
Freedom of Information (FOI) and have not been given access to the range 
of meaningful data that would allow the parliament and the public to see 
just what has happened and is happening in the Bay and how much more water 
is entering and leaving on each tide.

"The Port has repeatedly denied that the loss of Portsea Beach is the 
result of channel deepening, when all the signs that people have been 
observing for nearly four years point to that clearly being the case. Now, 
one of the confidential studies is confirming that the 'size and velocity 
of waves reflected towards Portsea front beach appear to have increased.

"The research also found that wave energy had been redistributed along the 
Mornington Peninsula following the completion of the project, which is 
also no surprise to those of us who have seen for ourselves the 'larger 
and more powerful swells at the southern end of the peninsula' over the 
past four years,” Ms Pennicuik said.

"However, evidence that channel deepening has enabled any larger ships to 
enter Port Phillip Bay is and always has been opaque and dubious.

"Many scientists warned that allowing significantly larger volumes of 
water into the Bay though the Heads could lead to just the sort of 
outcomes we are seeing, but were dismissed and derided at the time. 

"What is most galling is that the decision makers who ignored these 
warnings have escaped any responsibility for the damage done in the south 
of the Bay, which is likely to be irreversible and ongoing.

"Meanwhile, the DEPI stands by its position that there are no issues from 
channel deepening in relation to erosion at Portsea.

"This official denial has to end. Port Phillip Bay is public property and 
an ecological system. 

"The government and Port of Melbourne should release all the data and 
information it has, and continues to collect, on the changes to the Bay," 
Ms Pennicuik concluded.

For further comment: Sue Pennicuik – 0409 055 875

Read more: 
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/beach-loss-linked-to-dredging-20130706-2pj8b.html



///////************************************************************///////////////

Parliament of Victoria                                                                                                                    . 
Important Disclaimer Notice:


The information contained in this email  including any attachments, may be 
confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender and delete it from  your system. Any unauthorised 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of all or part of this email, including 
any attachments, is not permitted. This email, including any attachments, should 
be dealt with in accordance with copyright and  privacy legislation. 
Except where otherwise stated, views expressed are those of the individual sender.