[Greens-Media] Vic Greens reject Libs motion on desalination
Elizabeth.Ingham at parliament.vic.gov.au
Elizabeth.Ingham at parliament.vic.gov.au
Wed Apr 18 14:16:32 EST 2007
Wednesday 18 April 2007
VICTORIAN GREENS REJECT LIBS MOTION ON DESALINATION
Greens MLCs have rejected a motion by the Liberals for a parliamentary
inquiry into the desalination option.
"We reckon desalination is a dud and there's plenty of evidence for that.
Options such as industrial reuse of water, water recycling and stormwater
management all offer better, cheaper options," said Greg Barber, the
Greens member for Northern Metropolitan Region.
"The Liberals should check out the report by the Australian Conservation
Foundation, showing even an expanded water tank program could beat
desalination, without all the environmental negatives," Mr Barber said.
"Even a 125 megalitre per day desalination plant would produce up to a
quarter of a million tonnes of CO2 equivalent each year and we don't need
that when we are trying to get Victoria's greenhouse emissions going down
rather than up," Mr Barber said.
" What we need in Melbourne is to set targets for water efficiency, break
them down across the various sectors of the economy and get on with
implementing them. Even better would be to end logging in the mountain
forests which provide our water. Young regrowth trees from clearfelling
suck up heaps of water, leaving less for our rivers and dams," Mr Barber
said.
"The proposal for a desalination plant in Sydney was rejected by an upper
house inquiry of that State's parliament. The NSW government-appointed
group chaired by Clean Up Australia founder Ian Kiernan described
desalination as the 'least favored and least acceptable' option for
securing Sydney's water supply," Mr Barber said.
Speaking in Parliament today, Mr Barber described a desalination plant as
a quick fix, high cost, high tech, magic bullet solution, with a photo
opportunity. By contrast, the Greens were calling for lower risk
solutions that lead to better outcomes. He described the water savings
from reduced consumption as "negaliltres" rather than "megalitres".
For further comment: Greg Barber 0433 044 771
*************************************
Liz Ingham
Office of Colleen Hartland MLC
9651 8413 / 0409 333 595
Parliament of Victoria Notice:
The information contained in this email including any attachments, may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or dissemination of all or part of this email, including any attachments, is not permitted. This email, including any attachments, should be dealt with in accordance with copyright and privacy legislation. Except where otherwise stated, views expressed are those of the individual sender.
More information about the Media
mailing list